I know that the US presidential election for 2008 is over. It seems, however, that the campaign for the 2012 and subsequent elections is going strong. Two items that actually deal with the 2008 election reached my attention this week.
First - Sarah Palin on prayer
In a widely reported speech, Governor Palin commented on her frustrations on the night of the Vice Presidential debate in finding someone with whom she could pray. She stated that she she felt she needed just a little extra boost. Looking around the room at all of the McCain staffers and Palin staffers and whoever else was there from the RNC, she said she realized that there was no one there with whom she could pray, so she prayed with her daughter.
Many have already weighed on this incident. Some have pointed out her insensitivity to her staff who believed in her, even though, they say, this shows that she did not believe in them. Others have decryed her needing to pray at all; they suggest she would have been better served dealing with issues. Still others wonder why she needed someone else; why couldn't she just pray by herself, they ask.
While I am not sure that an inspired prayer at that moment would have changed anything in the debate that night or in the election, I am certain that Governor Palin felt she needed to pray - perhaps to steady her nerves - and, thus, she should have the opportunity to pray with whomever she wants. There is a tradition within evangelical Christianity that prayers have more "oomph" when they are affirmed by another - "whenever two or three of you agree concerning any thing, it shall be done" approach - so having an agreeing partner was important for her.
I see this anecdote as one more piece of evidence given by party standard-bearers of how far the Republican Party has strayed from its conservative Christian base and how they must return to that base in order to be successful again. This line of thought was put forward by many within the RNC in the weeks following the election. It seems to me this story is an illustration of how far the RNC has "backslid" - to use evangelical Christian terms - and must repent before it can go forward.
Second - Conservative analyst pulls no punches
In a column on WorldNetDaily, Jill Stanek wrote a scathing article in the days immediately following the 2008 election criticizing the new President and the American people. The opening paragraphs of the article follow:
Barack Obama was elected president despite the fact he supports abortion into the fourth trimester.
Either the 63 million people voting for him didn't know about his radical record, which includes abandoning abortion survivors to die, didn't care, or didn't believe it.
Meanwhile all three state pro-life initiatives failed Tuesday: the California Abortion Waiting Period and Parental Notification Initiative, the Colorado Equal Rights Amendment (defining personhood as beginning at conception) and the South Dakota Abortion Ban Initiative.
And both state anti-life initiatives passed: the Michigan Stem Cell Initiative (allowing human embryo experimentation) and the Washington Death with Dignity Initiative (allowing physician assisted suicide).
Altogether, this means we are fooling ourselves if we think the United States is still a Christian nation. Its people just elected a barbarian as president, authorized the killing of both its youngest and sickest, rejected scientific fact that human life begins at conception, blocked parental intervention of abortions of young girls, and voted down the wording of an abortion ban they said only two years ago they would support.
Frankly, I am not aware of 'scientific fact' proving that human life begins at conception. There are a few other 'factual' statements Ms. Stanek made that I think are overblown as well. That said, I strongly object to her categorization of President Obama as a barbarian. This is one more instance of a defeated political party engaging in the same smear tactics that they criticized when they were in power.
As I said, the campaign for 2012 and beyond is in full bloom.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Remnants from 2008 US Presidential election
Posted by michael at 7:55 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment